IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Breon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Wayzata USHS-MN 11 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2020-21 Blake USHS-MN 18 5 7 12 0.667 0.0844 0.0844 0.1619 0.1619
2021-22 Rochester Grizzlies NA3HL 44 12 12 24 0.545 0.0685 0.0675 0.1722 0.1698
2022-23 King Rebellion OJHL 23 3 1 4 0.174 0.0426 0.0394 0.1197 0.1108
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA — 14 1 1 2 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Lawrence
+230.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30687
Forward overall
#1802
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Beaudette
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike English
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2001-02
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Ralph
Canton · 2013-14
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.