← New Search ↗ Social Card

Latrell Charleson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-07-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Prince George Spruce Kings BCHL 23 0 3 3 0.130 0.0502 0.0566 0.1898 0.2141
2012-13 BCHL 28 0 3 3 0.107 0.0413 0.0446 0.1559 0.1685
2013-14 Battlefords North Stars SJHL 50 5 22 27 0.540 0.1383 0.1445 0.4071 0.4254
2014-15 Surrey Eagles BCHL 40 11 12 23 0.575 0.2215 0.2188 0.8368 0.8265
2015-16 Vernon Vipers BCHL 36 6 12 18 0.500 0.1926 0.1799 0.7277 0.6798
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC 5 0 1 1 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2016-17 · Buffalo State
+8.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7458
Defenseman overall
#1178
Defenseman born in 1995
#1643
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Canton · 2017-18
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2006-07
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.