IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jon Plaszcz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-01-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Breezy Point North Stars NA3HL 22 5 4 9 0.409 0.0452 0.0452 0.1292 0.1291
2013-14 — NA3HL 24 7 4 11 0.458 0.0507 0.0487 0.1447 0.1390
2014-15 New Ulm Steel NA3HL 35 10 16 26 0.743 0.0822 0.0749 0.2345 0.2137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen FR 8 1 1 2 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2015-16 · Wisconsin-Stout
+311.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12627
Defenseman overall
#1599
Defenseman born in 1994
#2043
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Paul Michura
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Blair
Marian · 2006-07
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Cam Gwatkin
Southern Maine · 2024-25
0.476 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.