icepath.io · Hockey Analytics

← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brandon Altman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-08 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2014-15	New York Apple Core	EHL	11	0	0	0	0.000	—	—	—	—
2015-16	Mississauga Chargers	OJHL	11	1	3	4	0.364	0.0891	0.0837	0.2503	0.2352
2016-17	Philadelphia Flyers Elite	USPHL-Premier-Classic	26	4	10	14	0.538	0.1512	0.1421	0.4428	0.4163

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2017-18	Western New England	D3	CNE	—	0	0	0	0	0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#46143

Forward overall

#2100

Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Will Suter

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG

→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)

0.25 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Ali Thomas

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG

→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)

0.18 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Yasin Cissé

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG

→ Boston University

0.23 No data

NCAAe PPG

Davey Middleton

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG

→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)

0.27 Developing

NCAAe PPG

Eli Lichtenwald

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG

→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)

0.19 Strong

NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Niko Happo

Manhattanville · 2017-18

0.518 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

Brett Campbell

Marian · 2011-12

0.462 Average

actual D2/3 PPG

Nick Minerva

Neumann · 2016-17

0.667 Strong

actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.