IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Garrett Geane Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 40 1 3 4 0.100 0.0193 0.0202 0.0631 0.0662
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 36 0 2 2 0.056 0.0128 0.0129 0.0272 0.0275
2015-16 Express Hockey Club EHL 35 2 9 11 0.314 0.0726 0.0702 0.1538 0.1487
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Wentworth D3 CNE — 16 1 0 1 0.062
2016-17 Wentworth D3 CNE — 21 0 5 5 0.238
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2016-17 · Wentworth
+433.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23730
Defenseman overall
#2491
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brennan Dickey
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Rossides
Tufts · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ben Lauder
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2009-10
0.556 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.