IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryan Carville Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-10-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 47 1 12 13 0.277 0.0776 0.0757 0.2274 0.2217
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Brockport D1 — SR 25 0 5 5 0.200
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC — 25 0 5 5 0.200
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC — 15 0 2 2 0.133
2016-17 SUNY Brockport D3 SUNYAC — 22 1 10 11 0.500
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 1 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#20869
Defenseman overall
#2174
Defenseman born in 1994
#266
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bill Walsh
Worcester State · 2002-03
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
James Hope
Post · 2024-25
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicholas Cyprian
Chatham · 2021-22
0.880 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.