← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christopher Timm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Richmond Generals USPHL-Elite 38 4 11 15 0.395 0.0364 0.0339 0.0904 0.0843
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Trine D3 NCHA 17 0 4 4 0.235
2017-18 Trine D3 NCHA 21 3 2 5 0.238
2016-17 Daniel Webster D3 JR 25 4 4 8 0.320
2015-16 Daniel Webster D3 SO 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#53594
Forward overall
#2274
Forward born in 1994
#954
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Superior · 2024-25
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2012-13
0.370 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2005-06
0.192 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.