IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Quincy Gregg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 37 6 14 20 0.540 0.1517 0.1510 0.4444 0.4422
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wesleyan D1 NESCAC SO 24 2 6 8 0.333
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 24 2 6 8 0.333
2018-19 Wesleyan D1 NESCAC FR 24 1 0 1 0.042
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC — 24 1 0 1 0.042
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 24 1 1 2 0.083
2016-17 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 26 2 10 12 0.462
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.46
2016-17 · Skidmore
+223.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10630
Defenseman overall
#1576
Defenseman born in 1996
#145
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Darren McCormick
SUNY Cortland · 2012-13
1.320 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Xander Mavrogiannis
Assumption · 2017-18
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jesse Nemgar
St. Scholastica · 2010-11
2.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.