← New Search ↗ Social Card

Xander Mavrogiannis Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-02-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Walpole Express EHLP 38 6 6 12 0.316 0.0362 0.0378 0.0712 0.0744
2016-17 Walpole Express EHLP 37 17 27 44 1.189 0.1364 0.1336 0.2680 0.2625
2017-18 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 15 36 51 1.159 0.1516 0.1472 0.3934 0.3820
2018-19 East Coast Wizards EHL 42 8 6 14 0.333 0.0770 0.0723 0.1631 0.1530
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 1 1 0 1 1.000
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 15 1 2 3 0.200
2019-20 Assumption D2 NE10 13 1 4 5 0.385
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2019-20 · Assumption
+339.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24661
Forward overall
#1198
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wentworth · 2006-07
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2013-14
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.