IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Dittrich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Orono High USHS-MN 25 15 16 31 1.240 0.3338 0.3338 0.3012 0.3012
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Olaf D1 — SR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2019-20 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 20 3 4 7 0.350
2018-19 St. Olaf D1 — JR 23 0 3 3 0.130
2018-19 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 23 0 3 3 0.130
2017-18 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 24 1 2 3 0.125
2016-17 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 23 4 5 9 0.391
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.39
2016-17 · St. Olaf
+37.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12814
Forward overall
#447
in USHS-MN

D1 Comparables

Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jason Salvaggio
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tony Calderone
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ Michigan (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Joe Hall
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Suede
Adrian · 2018-19
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Owen Guerin
UMass Dartmouth · 2022-23
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.