← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Jackson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-01-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Portland Jr. Pirates USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 3 12 15 0.341 0.0957 0.0945 0.2804 0.2769
2015-16 Hawkesbury Hawks CCHL 53 2 14 16 0.302 0.0655 0.0592 0.2335 0.2111
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Manhattanville D1 UCHC SR 25 3 11 14 0.560
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 25 3 11 14 0.560
2018-19 Manhattanville D1 UCHC JR 32 1 4 5 0.156
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 32 1 4 5 0.156
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 26 7 10 17 0.654
2016-17 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 21 2 7 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2016-17 · Manhattanville
+519.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17729
Defenseman overall
#2073
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marian · 2006-07
0.708 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2016-17
0.238 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.