IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Broydon Stufko Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-10-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — CCHL 56 16 21 37 0.661 0.1433 0.1418 0.5112 0.5057
2015-16 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 61 16 16 32 0.525 0.1138 0.1071 0.4059 0.3819
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SR 28 6 10 16 0.571
2018-19 St. Thomas D3 CCHA JR 21 2 2 4 0.191
2017-18 St. Thomas D3 CCHA SO 26 3 1 4 0.154
2016-17 St. Thomas D3 CCHA FR 27 4 4 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2016-17 · St. Thomas
+186.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30663
Forward overall
#1219
Forward born in 1995
#679
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jett Otwell
Curry · 2024-25
0.700 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Will Robertson
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fleck
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.