IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bump Lisk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 30 0 7 7 0.233 0.0655 0.0652 0.1921 0.1911
2015-16 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Premier-Classic 37 0 14 14 0.378 0.1062 0.1005 0.3117 0.2948
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Endicott D1 — SR 10 1 5 6 0.600
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE SR 10 1 5 6 0.600
2018-19 Endicott D1 — JR 24 0 5 5 0.208
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE JR 24 0 5 5 0.208
2017-18 Endicott D3 CNE SO 21 1 4 5 0.238
2016-17 Endicott D3 CNE FR 27 0 7 7 0.259
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2016-17 · Endicott
+218.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#18771
Defenseman overall
#2129
Defenseman born in 1995
#239
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Vinny Servizzi
Alvernia · 2021-22
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Colton Kennedy
Wisconsin-Superior · 2009-10
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Alec Brandrup
Norwich · 2013-14
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.