IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Dockery Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 44 3 10 13 0.295 0.0829 0.0849 0.2434 0.2492
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 10 14 24 0.585 0.1643 0.1602 0.4821 0.4700
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 28 0 7 7 0.250
2018-19 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 31 3 5 8 0.258
2017-18 Norwich D3 LittleEast SO 26 4 9 13 0.500
2016-17 Norwich D3 LittleEast FR 27 0 6 6 0.222
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Norwich
+80.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12772
Defenseman overall
#1702
Defenseman born in 1995
#174
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dave Lewandowski
Wentworth · 2004-05
0.857 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Scott Taje
Lake Forest · 2002-03
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Klin
Buffalo State · 2008-09
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.