IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Beck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Toronto Patriots OJHL 43 6 9 15 0.349 0.0855 0.0818 0.2399 0.2294
2015-16 — OJHL 54 15 33 48 0.889 0.2179 0.1963 0.6113 0.5508
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Cortland D1 — SR 12 2 4 6 0.500
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 12 2 4 6 0.500
2018-19 Cortland D1 — JR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC JR 25 3 6 9 0.360
2017-18 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 15 2 5 7 0.467
2016-17 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 19 1 4 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2016-17 · SUNY Cortland
+104.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28253
Forward overall
#1103
Forward born in 1995
#1422
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kelby Lorenz
Southern Maine · 2012-13
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Kussmann
SUNY Brockport · 2024-25
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Adkins
Concordia (WI) · 2015-16
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.