← New Search ↗ Social Card

Josh Adkins Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Victoria Grizzlies BCHL 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0389 0.0415 0.1458 0.1556
2013-14 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 52 2 11 13 0.250 0.0973 0.0993 0.3646 0.3722
2014-15 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 49 11 22 33 0.673 0.2621 0.2554 0.9822 0.9570
2015-16 BCHL 55 22 26 48 0.873 0.3397 0.3128 1.2727 1.1718
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 24 6 10 16 0.667
2019-20 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SR 24 6 10 16 0.667
2018-19 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2018-19 Concordia Wisconsin D3 JR 25 4 9 13 0.520
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC SO 27 8 12 20 0.741
2017-18 Concordia Wisconsin D3 SO 27 8 12 20 0.741
2016-17 Concordia D3 MIAC FR 25 7 9 16 0.640
2016-17 Concordia Wisconsin D3 FR 25 7 9 16 0.640
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2016-17 · Concordia
+158.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#13635
Forward overall
#485
Forward born in 1995
#1155
in BCHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2012-13
1.241 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2014-15
1.074 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.030 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.