IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aleksandr Makarov Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 39 2 14 16 0.410 0.0379 0.0373 0.0940 0.0924
2015-16 Boston Jr. Rangers EHL 35 4 11 15 0.429 0.0990 0.0940 0.2097 0.1991
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 19 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC — 22 3 5 8 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2018-19 · Anna Maria
+496.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#43173
Forward overall
#1846
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Victor Nordenson
Manhattanville · 2006-07
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
David Henry
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2012-13
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Byron Hartley
St. Norbert · 2022-23
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.