IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Vannier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 26 2 4 6 0.231 0.0812 0.0804 0.1132 0.1121
2015-16 — EHL 34 10 5 15 0.441 0.1553 0.1469 0.2163 0.2046
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wesleyan D1 — SR 13 1 1 2 0.154
2019-20 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SR 13 1 1 2 0.154
2018-19 Wesleyan D1 — JR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2018-19 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC JR 26 1 5 6 0.231
2017-18 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC SO 14 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Wesleyan D3 NESCAC FR 13 2 0 2 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2016-17 · Wesleyan
+49.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#41506
Forward overall
#1751
Forward born in 1995
#1724
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jarrett Kup
Curry · 2013-14
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Teagan Waugh
Manhattanville · 2012-13
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Chambers
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.