← New Search ↗ Social Card

Stuart Fierheller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-07-19 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 43 3 2 5 0.116 0.0285 0.0320 0.0801 0.0900
2012-13 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0613 0.0658 0.1721 0.1848
2013-14 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 52 0 3 3 0.058 0.0141 0.0144 0.0397 0.0406
2014-15 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 48 3 5 8 0.167 0.0409 0.0397 0.1148 0.1115
2015-16 Lindsay Muskies OJHL 33 2 7 9 0.273 0.0668 0.0612 0.1878 0.1720
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Canton D1 SUNYAC SR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2019-20 Canton D3 SUNYAC SR 24 1 2 3 0.125
2018-19 Canton D1 SUNYAC JR 22 1 0 1 0.045
2018-19 Canton D3 SUNYAC JR 22 1 0 1 0.045
2017-18 Canton D3 SUNYAC SO 15 1 3 4 0.267
2016-17 Canton D3 SUNYAC FR 12 0 2 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2016-17 · Canton
+235.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20020
Defenseman overall
#2220
Defenseman born in 1995
#3849
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salve Regina · 2017-18
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Misericordia · 2024-25
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.