IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Kleckner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 38 5 9 14 0.368 0.0274 0.0274 0.0844 0.0843
2016-17 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Elite 35 4 8 12 0.343 0.0255 0.0240 0.0786 0.0740
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D1 — SO 14 0 3 3 0.214
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — SO 14 0 3 3 0.214
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 2 0 1 1 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.02
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Bryn Athyn
+2204.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#54768
Forward overall
#2651
Forward born in 1996
#1074
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Arnold
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2014-15
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Faupel
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Skalski
Manhattanville · 2008-09
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.