← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cory Checco Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-05-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Rochester John Marshall High USHS-MN 25 15 16 31 1.240 0.3338 0.3532 0.3012 0.3187
2017-18 Jersey Hitmen NCDC 9 0 2 2 0.222 0.1239 0.1292 0.1797 0.1874
2018-19 MJHL 51 12 13 25 0.490 0.1333 0.1301 0.3089 0.3014
2019-20 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 26 3 9 12 0.462 0.1255 0.1255 0.2908 0.2908
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Lawrence D3 NCHA GR 17 3 2 5 0.294
2023-24 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 25 7 10 17 0.680
2022-23 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 23 7 7 14 0.609
2021-22 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 19 6 7 13 0.684
2020-21 Lawrence D1 ECAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32201
Forward overall
#1732
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.19 PPG
→ New Hampshire
0.10 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lake Forest · 2016-17
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bowdoin · 2023-24
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.