← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 32 1 1 2 0.062 0.0369 0.0406 0.1877 0.2067
2014-15 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 41 1 1 2 0.049 0.0288 0.0303 0.1466 0.1542
2015-16 Tri-City Storm USHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0737 0.0741 0.3754 0.3774
2016-17 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 50 12 12 24 0.480 0.1849 0.1802 0.6985 0.6807
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 6 0 2 2 0.333
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 24 12 18 30 1.250
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 28 12 6 18 0.643
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 27 9 8 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2017-18 · Lake Forest
+434.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#40712
Forward overall
#1973
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2022-23
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.