IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Aaron O'Neill Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 32 1 1 2 0.062 0.0398 0.0438 0.1873 0.2062
2014-15 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 41 1 1 2 0.049 0.0311 0.0327 0.1462 0.1538
2015-16 Tri-City Storm USHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0796 0.0800 0.3746 0.3766
2016-17 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 50 12 12 24 0.480 0.1868 0.1820 0.7000 0.6821
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 6 0 2 2 0.333
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 24 12 18 30 1.250
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 28 12 6 18 0.643
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 27 9 8 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2017-18 · Lake Forest
+420.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30396
Forward overall
#1350
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Robin Höglund
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.19 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Kyle Gattelaro
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jackson Leef
Westfield State · 2011-12
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hayden Stocks
Wisconsin-Stout · 2022-23
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.