IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Conrad Phillips Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-07-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 58 12 11 23 0.397 0.0763 0.0791 0.2501 0.2593
2019-20 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 59 27 21 48 0.814 0.1566 0.1566 0.5131 0.5131
2020-21 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 10 8 3 11 1.100 0.2118 0.2118 0.6937 0.6937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Marian D3 NCHA — 12 1 1 2 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2021-22 · Marian
+146.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
88%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23878
Forward overall
#1117
Forward born in 2000
#266
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Jason Ford
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Wisconsin (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Torrel
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Adam Johnson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.46 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Fitzgerald
NTDP-U18 · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ Boston College (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Josh Nenadal
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.30 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Luc Kreuser
Concordia · 2015-16
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liam Wells
Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Teddy Falk
Augsburg · 2007-08
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.