IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Stahel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-12-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 30 4 9 13 0.433 0.0323 0.0327 0.0993 0.1007
2015-16 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Elite 40 15 11 26 0.650 0.0484 0.0468 0.1489 0.1440
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 20 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 15 0 1 1 0.067
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 21 2 6 8 0.381
2016-17 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2016-17 · Franklin Pierce
+373.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46928
Forward overall
#2031
Forward born in 1995
#592
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Fecteau
UMass Dartmouth · 2024-25
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy Morgan
Fredonia · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Lecey
Nichols · 2011-12
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.