← New Search ↗ Social Card

Randall Wolf Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-09-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 26 0 3 3 0.115 0.0267 0.0271 0.0565 0.0573
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 40 2 13 15 0.375 0.0866 0.0840 0.1835 0.1779
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bethel D3 MIAC 17 0 2 2 0.118
2018-19 Bethel D3 MIAC 25 0 6 6 0.240
2017-18 Marian D3 NCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#18180
Defenseman overall
#2100
Defenseman born in 1995
#2224
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2012-13
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2018-19
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.