← New Search ↗ Social Card

Émile Pichette Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 5 0 1 1 0.200 0.0385 0.0385 0.1260 0.1260
2021-22 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 26 2 5 7 0.269 0.0518 0.0516 0.1696 0.1690
2022-23 Hearst Lumberjacks NOJHL 50 34 36 70 1.400 0.1994 0.1872 0.5809 0.5454
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Westfield State D3 MASCAC GR 28 10 16 26 0.929
2024-25 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 26 7 16 23 0.885
2023-24 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 27 12 19 31 1.148
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
1.15
2023-24 · Westfield State
+908.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
50%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24308
Forward overall
#1360
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2015-16
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2021-22
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.