← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Rogers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-09-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Elmira Impact USPHL-Premier 39 18 29 47 1.205 0.3972 0.3972 0.4100 0.4100
2021-22 Steinbach Pistons MJHL 54 30 37 67 1.241 0.3373 0.3361 0.7819 0.7791
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SR 17 1 0 1 0.059
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC JR 4 0 1 1 0.250
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC SO 29 4 2 6 0.207
2022-23 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC FR 34 3 5 8 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · St. Cloud State
-18.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
28%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10886
Forward overall
#524
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Vermont (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2004-05
0.765 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.