← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Siso Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Portage Terriers MJHL 44 20 22 42 0.955 0.1837 0.1896 0.6019 0.6214
2022-23 Portage Terriers MJHL 41 12 24 36 0.878 0.1690 0.1666 0.5537 0.5457
2023-24 Portage Terriers MJHL 41 15 16 31 0.756 0.1455 0.1358 0.4768 0.4450
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Calvin University ACHA_D1 12 3 2 5 0.417
2024-25 Calvin University ACHA_D1 12 3 2 5 0.417
2023-24 Calvin University ACHA_D1 12 3 2 5 0.417
2022-23 Calvin University ACHA_D1 12 3 2 5 0.417
2021-22 Calvin University ACHA_D1 12 3 2 5 0.417
2020-21 Calvin University ACHA_D1 12 3 2 5 0.417

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24237
Forward overall
#1335
Forward born in 2003
#274
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryn Athyn · 2017-18
1.044 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.