← New Search ↗ Social Card

Slade Stanick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-08-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 MJHL 42 9 9 18 0.429 0.0825 0.0857 0.2703 0.2809
2022-23 Portage Terriers MJHL 45 13 22 35 0.778 0.1497 0.1486 0.4905 0.4868
2023-24 Portage Terriers MJHL 51 16 35 51 1.000 0.1925 0.1810 0.6306 0.5928
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minot State University ACHA_D1 29 4 13 17 0.586
2024-25 Minot State University ACHA_D1 29 4 13 17 0.586
2023-24 Minot State University ACHA_D1 29 4 13 17 0.586
2022-23 Minot State University ACHA_D1 29 4 13 17 0.586
2021-22 Minot State University ACHA_D1 29 4 13 17 0.586
2020-21 Minot State University ACHA_D1 29 4 13 17 0.586

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25802
Forward overall
#1450
Forward born in 2003
#316
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chatham · 2023-24
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.