IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Timothy Drevitch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Jr. Titans EHL 9 1 0 1 0.111 0.0391 0.0429 0.0545 0.0597
2016-17 Boston Jr. Bandits EHL 46 11 11 22 0.478 0.1683 0.1695 0.2345 0.2361
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Worcester State D3 MASCAC JR 24 6 6 12 0.500
2018-19 Worcester State D3 MASCAC SO 26 9 6 15 0.577
2017-18 Worcester State D3 MASCAC FR 22 10 8 18 0.818
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.82
2017-18 · Worcester State
+704.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33473
Forward overall
#1579
Forward born in 1997
#1178
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brett Mecrones
New England · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Daniel Dupell
Plymouth State · 2011-12
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Sherban
Hamilton · 2003-04
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.