IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Andrew Pizzo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-08-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Trenton Golden Hawks OJHL 37 0 11 11 0.297 0.0729 0.0746 0.2046 0.2094
2015-16 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 39 5 13 18 0.462 0.1131 0.1095 0.3177 0.3077
2016-17 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 39 11 14 25 0.641 0.1571 0.1451 0.4412 0.4075
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 25 3 5 8 0.320
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 24 2 2 4 0.167
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SO 14 3 6 9 0.643
2016-17 Niagara D1 AHA FR 19 0 1 1 0.053
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2016-17 · Niagara
-41.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10789
Defenseman overall
#1608
Defenseman born in 1996
#2249
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bobby Cahill
Hobart · 2005-06
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jamie Lukas
SUNY Brockport · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bonfield
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2021-22
0.381 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.