IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Warren Clark Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2004-08-31 Country: Canada
2023 NHL Draft Round 6, Pick #179  ·  Tampa Bay Lightning Tampa Bay Lightning
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 — NCDC 3 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2022-23 — MJHL 55 6 32 38 0.691 0.1879 0.1967 0.4354 0.4557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Northern Michigan D1 CCHA JR 33 2 4 6 0.182
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC — 20 1 3 4 0.200
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 NCHC — 31 0 3 3 0.097
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2023-24 · St. Cloud State
-47.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

50%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
10%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7418
Defenseman overall
#1781
Defenseman born in 2004

D1 Comparables

Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Kapla
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Jake Bischoff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Mackey
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Air Force (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Caouette
New England College · 2001-02
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Shugart
Williams · 2012-13
0.591 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Jacobs
Neumann · 2003-04
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.