IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Garvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Brockville Braves CCHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2169 0.2481 0.7660 0.8760
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 56 1 3 4 0.071 0.0155 0.0170 0.0547 0.0601
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 52 4 15 19 0.365 0.0793 0.0832 0.2799 0.2938
2014-15 — CCHL 59 5 15 20 0.339 0.0735 0.0738 0.2597 0.2606
2015-16 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 62 8 29 37 0.597 0.1294 0.1236 0.4571 0.4366
2016-17 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 59 10 30 40 0.678 0.1471 0.1328 0.5193 0.4688
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 2 7 9 0.360
2017-18 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 25 2 7 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · Concordia
+195.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8042
Defenseman overall
#1325
Defenseman born in 1996
#688
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jordan Schindel
Manhattanville · 2007-08
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Batis
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Goldman
Plymouth State · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.