IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brett Garvey Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-13 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Brockville Braves CCHL 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2854 0.3264 0.7741 0.8853
2012-13 Brockville Braves CCHL 56 1 3 4 0.071 0.0204 0.0224 0.0553 0.0608
2013-14 Brockville Braves CCHL 52 4 15 19 0.365 0.1043 0.1095 0.2829 0.2969
2014-15 — CCHL 59 5 15 20 0.339 0.0968 0.0971 0.2624 0.2633
2015-16 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 62 8 29 37 0.597 0.1703 0.1627 0.4620 0.4413
2016-17 Smiths Falls Bears CCHL 59 10 30 40 0.678 0.1935 0.1747 0.5248 0.4737
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 2 7 9 0.360
2017-18 Concordia Wisconsin D3 — FR 25 2 7 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · Concordia
+124.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6104
Defenseman overall
#1066
Defenseman born in 1996
#828
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Drew Brevig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
John Rey
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Rowbotham
Amherst · 2010-11
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Noah Batis
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Affleck
Northland · 2001-02
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.