IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Griffin Ayotte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-08-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 33 7 4 11 0.333 0.0642 0.0669 0.2100 0.2189
2023-24 — MJHL 55 13 10 23 0.418 0.0805 0.0797 0.2635 0.2609
2024-25 Waywayseecappo Wolverines MJHL 44 14 13 27 0.614 0.1181 0.1104 0.3867 0.3616
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 19 0 5 5 0.263
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2025-26 · Augsburg
+213.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
22%
NCAA D2/D3
42%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#39889
Forward overall
#2557
Forward born in 2004
#908
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Hollander
Becker · 2009-10
0.467 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Strand
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tim Crowley
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.