← New Search ↗ Social Card

Thomas Flack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 54 13 19 32 0.593 0.1780 0.1640 0.4056 0.3736
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 St. Michael's College D1 JR 26 8 14 22 0.846
2019-20 St. Michael's College D2 JR 26 8 14 22 0.846
2018-19 St. Michael's College D1 SO 26 7 4 11 0.423
2018-19 St. Michael's College D2 SO 26 7 4 11 0.423
2017-18 St. Michael's College D2 FR 23 4 2 6 0.261
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2017-18 · St. Michael's College
+85.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31731
Forward overall
#1335
Forward born in 1996
#2127
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2018-19
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2017-18
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.