← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick Gagliardi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 40 2 14 16 0.400 0.0480 0.0469 0.0918 0.0898
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Elite 37 3 17 20 0.540 0.0648 0.0596 0.1241 0.1142
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 GR 19 0 2 2 0.105
2020-21 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 30 0 4 4 0.133
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 25 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 14 1 4 5 0.357
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2017-18 · Franklin Pierce
+593.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19622
Defenseman overall
#2341
Defenseman born in 1996
#744
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Concordia Wisconsin · 2014-15
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2021-22
0.210 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.