IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Cochran Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-02-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Philadelphia Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 44 17 20 37 0.841 0.1132 0.1132 0.2862 0.2862
2021-22 Philadelphia Hockey Club USPHL-Premier 22 7 5 12 0.545 0.0734 0.0677 0.1857 0.1712
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Neumann D3 MAC SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Neumann D3 MAC JR 22 0 4 4 0.182
2023-24 Neumann D3 MAC SO 20 1 3 4 0.200
2022-23 Neumann D3 MAC FR 19 3 1 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2022-23 · Neumann
+262.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#40668
Forward overall
#1848
Forward born in 2001
#2167
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Nick DeCenzo
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dan Genovese
Manhattanville · 2005-06
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Sundquist
Trinity · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Ross
Fredonia · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.