← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zander Lizotte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2002-02-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 31 1 3 4 0.129 0.0249 0.0249 0.0590 0.0590
2019-20 Frederick Gunn NE-Prep 35 2 4 6 0.171 0.0331 0.0331 0.0784 0.0784
2020-21 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 34 3 15 18 0.529 0.1223 0.1223 0.4281 0.4281
2021-22 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 42 9 7 16 0.381 0.0880 0.0862
2022-23 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs NCDC 50 7 24 31 0.620 0.1433 0.1344 0.5013 0.4701
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UMass Boston D3 JR 23 2 6 8 0.348
2024-25 UMass Boston D3 NEHC SO 17 1 3 4 0.235
2023-24 UMass Boston D3 NEHC FR 11 1 2 3 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2023-24 · UMass Boston
+150.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3248
Defenseman overall
#879
Defenseman born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
New England · 2017-18
0.724 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Fredonia · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.