IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mark DerManulian Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 42 3 16 19 0.452 0.1270 0.1319 0.3720 0.3863
2016-17 Utica Jr. Comets USPHL-Premier-Classic 41 7 21 28 0.683 0.1917 0.1897 0.5615 0.5557
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 4 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 26 4 22 26 1.000
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 26 5 11 16 0.615
2017-18 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 26 0 5 5 0.192
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.19
2017-18 · Lake Forest
+22.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9397
Defenseman overall
#1619
Defenseman born in 1997
#130
in USPHL-Premier-Classic

D1 Comparables

Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Van Voorhis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bryan Ross
Fredonia · 2007-08
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Wagner
Saint John's · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Laidlaw
Utica · 2004-05
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.