IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Carabia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Express Hockey Club EHL 35 2 6 8 0.229 0.0528 0.0531 0.1119 0.1126
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 48 6 34 40 0.833 0.1925 0.1850 0.4077 0.3919
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Salve Regina D3 CNE SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Salve Regina D1 CNE JR 21 2 8 10 0.476
2019-20 Salve Regina D3 CNE JR 21 2 8 10 0.476
2018-19 Salve Regina D1 CNE SO 22 1 1 2 0.091
2018-19 Salve Regina D3 CNE SO 22 1 1 2 0.091
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 28 0 4 4 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2017-18 · Salve Regina
+14.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6641
Defenseman overall
#1151
Defenseman born in 1996
#787
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Patrick Manning
Anna Maria · 2017-18
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Roberts Smits
Buffalo State · 2015-16
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Miles Berg
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.