IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Eric Hildebrand Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-05-07 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — EHL 27 7 6 13 0.481 0.1112 0.1113 0.2356 0.2358
2016-17 East Coast Wizards EHL 47 15 13 28 0.596 0.1376 0.1315 0.2915 0.2785
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Chatham D1 UCHC SR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2020-21 Chatham D3 UCHC SR 5 0 1 1 0.200
2019-20 Chatham D1 UCHC JR 25 7 2 9 0.360
2019-20 Chatham D3 UCHC JR 25 7 2 9 0.360
2018-19 Chatham D1 UCHC SO 25 3 5 8 0.320
2018-19 Chatham D3 UCHC SO 25 3 5 8 0.320
2017-18 Chatham D3 UCHC FR 25 2 1 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2017-18 · Chatham
+13.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29742
Forward overall
#1236
Forward born in 1996
#906
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Connor Jensen
St. Olaf · 2024-25
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tikhon Ashikhmin
Plymouth State · 2023-24
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Whitehair
New England College · 2014-15
0.654 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.