IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Felhaber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 57 10 16 26 0.456 0.0989 0.1007 0.3494 0.3556
2015-16 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 58 11 22 33 0.569 0.1234 0.1196 0.4359 0.4226
2016-17 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 62 10 15 25 0.403 0.0875 0.0802 0.3089 0.2833
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D1 NESCAC JR 21 2 7 9 0.429
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 21 2 7 9 0.429
2018-19 Hamilton D1 NESCAC SO 26 5 3 8 0.308
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 26 5 3 8 0.308
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2017-18 · Hamilton
+265.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37427
Forward overall
#1626
Forward born in 1996
#921
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Mense
Western Connecticut · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Leonard
Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
C.J. Valerian
Hobart · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.