IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Felhaber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-04-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 57 10 16 26 0.456 0.1302 0.1325 0.3531 0.3594
2015-16 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 58 11 22 33 0.569 0.1624 0.1575 0.4405 0.4271
2016-17 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 62 10 15 25 0.403 0.1151 0.1055 0.3121 0.2862
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 21 2 7 9 0.429
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 26 5 3 8 0.308
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 10 1 2 3 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2017-18 · Hamilton
+177.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#30801
Forward overall
#1342
Forward born in 1996
#1089
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Inderieden
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2008-09
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Zalewski
Buffalo State · 2001-02
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyson Kirkby
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.