IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Calum Chau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-04-30 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Salisbury School NE-Prep 28 1 9 10 0.357 0.0689 0.0689 0.1634 0.1634
2021-22 Navan Grads CCHL 46 6 19 25 0.543 0.1179 0.1202 0.4207 0.4288
2022-23 Navan Grads CCHL 55 4 22 26 0.473 0.1025 0.0999 0.3659 0.3565
2023-24 Collingwood Blues OJHL 52 4 46 50 0.962 0.2357 0.2155 0.6581 0.6016
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 31 0 14 14 0.452
2024-25 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 20 2 4 6 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2024-25 · Hobart
+87.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

45%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#5637
Defenseman overall
#1415
Defenseman born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Lopez
Wisconsin-Superior · 2017-18
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Way
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Spencer Korona
Trinity · 2021-22
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.