← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New England Wolves EHL 39 10 12 22 0.564 0.1211 0.1202 0.2762 0.2742
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 47 14 15 29 0.617 0.1324 0.1254 0.3021 0.2862
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 22 2 1 3 0.136
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 22 2 1 3 0.136
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 22 2 1 3 0.136
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 22 2 1 3 0.136
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 22 2 1 3 0.136
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 22 2 1 3 0.136
2019-20 Saint Michael's D2 JR 19 2 3 5 0.263
2018-19 Saint Michael's D2 SO 19 7 1 8 0.421
2017-18 Saint Michael's D2 FR 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · Saint Michael's
+89.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31929
Forward overall
#1400
Forward born in 1996
#722
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Southern New Hampshire · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2016-17
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.