← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zachary Sullivan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-03-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New England Wolves EHL 39 10 12 22 0.564 0.1303 0.1293 0.2760 0.2740
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 47 14 15 29 0.617 0.1425 0.1350 0.3019 0.2860
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 22 2 1 3 0.136
2024-25 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 22 2 1 3 0.136
2023-24 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 22 2 1 3 0.136
2022-23 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 22 2 1 3 0.136
2021-22 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 22 2 1 3 0.136
2020-21 Mercyhurst ACHA_D1 AHA 22 2 1 3 0.136
2019-20 St. Michael's College D2 JR 19 2 3 5 0.263
2018-19 St. Michael's College D2 SO 19 7 1 8 0.421
2017-18 St. Michael's College D2 FR 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · St. Michael's College
+76.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27214
Forward overall
#1125
Forward born in 1996
#763
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

New England College · 2022-23
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern New Hampshire · 2013-14
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2024-25
0.462 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.