IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Dobberstein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Connecticut Nighthawks EHL 35 4 5 9 0.257 0.0376 0.0379 0.1261 0.1273
2016-17 Willmar WarHawks NA3HL 45 15 21 36 0.800 0.0885 0.0828 0.2534 0.2371
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 8 1 0 1 0.125
2018-19 Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 10 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 13 1 0 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2017-18 · Lawrence
+38.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#37406
Forward overall
#1626
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Watt
Stevenson · 2017-18
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Donnelly
Concordia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Aaron Spotts
St. Scholastica · 2005-06
0.346 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.