IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John Fine-Lease Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHLP 38 15 24 39 1.026 0.1177 0.1131 0.2313 0.2223
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 35 3 1 4 0.114 0.0264 0.0253 0.0559 0.0537
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 — 26 3 3 6 0.231
2019-20 Assumption D1 NE10 JR 28 4 7 11 0.393
2019-20 Assumption D2 NE10 GR 28 4 7 11 0.393
2018-19 Assumption D1 NE10 SO 15 1 0 1 0.067
2018-19 Assumption D2 NE10 SR 15 1 0 1 0.067
2017-18 Assumption D2 NE10 JR 20 1 0 1 0.050
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.05
2017-18 · Assumption
-3.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#46094
Forward overall
#2095
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Jordan
UMass Boston · 2009-10
0.067 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Starzi
Stevenson · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Joey DiBenedetto
Curry · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.