IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phillip Garcia Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-11-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Northern Cyclones EHLP 4 0 1 1 0.250 0.0163 0.0160 0.0564 0.0554
2016-17 Long Beach Sharks NA3HL 44 14 16 30 0.682 0.0754 0.0719 0.2152 0.2053
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Becker D3 — SR 7 2 2 4 0.571
2019-20 Becker D3 — JR 25 5 14 19 0.760
2018-19 Finlandia D3 — SO 25 0 2 2 0.080
2017-18 Finlandia D3 — FR 24 1 0 1 0.042
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.04
2017-18 · Finlandia
-10.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10070
Defenseman overall
#1522
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Taki Pantziris
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Klishko
Gustavus Adolphus · 2016-17
0.188 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Steven Phee
St. Scholastica · 2012-13
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Bailey
Wisconsin-Superior · 2006-07
0.231 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.