IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Brown Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 7 0 1 1 0.143 0.0503 0.0514 0.0701 0.0716
2016-17 Connecticut RoughRiders EHL 16 2 1 3 0.188 0.0660 0.0644 0.0919 0.0897
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Post D2 NE10 — 13 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Post D2 NE10 GR 9 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Bethel D3 — FR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Post D2 NE10 SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Post D2 NE10 JR 13 0 1 1 0.077
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2017-18 · Post
+51.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#53992
Forward overall
#2597
Forward born in 1996
#2683
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jon Skoog
St. Norbert · 2004-05
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Blaine Gamst
Concordia · 2005-06
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dylan Mattson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2018-19
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.