IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Elrod Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-01-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Nashville Jr. Predators NA3HL 30 1 5 6 0.200 0.0460 0.0489 0.0634 0.0673
2015-16 Texas Jr. Brahmas NA3HL 47 4 24 28 0.596 0.1370 0.1389 0.1887 0.1913
2016-17 — NOJHL 41 0 5 5 0.122 0.0310 0.0297 0.0506 0.0486
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Lawrence D1 ECAC SO 20 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 20 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#22535
Defenseman overall
#2802
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Matt Fuller
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kyle McKenzie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.09 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chris Fischer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Roger Powers
Canton · 2016-17
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jacob Evans
Bethel · 2018-19
0.143 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.