IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bobby Wurster Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 38 2 9 11 0.289 0.0669 0.0680 0.1417 0.1441
2016-17 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 47 3 23 26 0.553 0.1278 0.1242 0.2707 0.2631
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Lebanon Valley D1 MAC SO 14 0 1 1 0.071
2018-19 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 14 0 1 1 0.071
2017-18 Lebanon Valley D3 MAC — 12 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#10290
Defenseman overall
#1536
Defenseman born in 1996
#1318
in EHL

D1 Comparables

William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake Lindstrom
UMass Boston · 2024-25
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Livio Azevedo
SUNY Brockport · 2023-24
0.227 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Chalupsky
Concordia · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.